The humanity was absorbed
Doctrine · On Christ · 448–451
After the union there is one nature, the human having been taken up into the divine so that Christ is not of one substance with us.
The proposition Eutyches was pressed on at the Home Synod of 448 and would not disown, and the one Chalcedon set aside three years later.
Held it
- 448 — Eutyches (Holds). Confesses two natures before the union and one after, and will not say that Christ is of one substance with us. Attributed by the Home Synod of Constantinople. The Seven Ecumenical Councils (NPNF series 2 vol. 14) · Chalcedon (451), the Definition of Faith
Refused it
- 451 — The Council of Chalcedon (Condemns). Sets aside those who imagine a mixture or confusion of the two natures. The Seven Ecumenical Councils (NPNF series 2 vol. 14) · Chalcedon (451), the Definition of Faith
- 513 — Severus of Antioch (Rejects). Rejects it as firmly as Chalcedon does, which is why the formula he defends is not the one condemned in 451. Letters, and Against the Impious Grammarian · Severus, Against the Impious Grammarian, book 2
In the disputes
- The Eutychian dispute Eutyches, pressed at a synod in his own city in 448, would not say that Christ is of one substance with us.
First stated in this form after The Seven Ecumenical Councils (NPNF series 2 vol. 14) · Chalcedon (451), the Definition of Faith.